Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a conditional outlier detection method to identify potentially erroneous patient-management actions within EHR systems. The approach leverages historical patient data to establish expected action patterns and flags deviations as anomalies warranting alerts. Evaluation on 4,486 post-cardiac surgery patients, judged by expert clinicians, demonstrates that anomaly-based alerts can achieve low false positive rates and that alert rates correlate with anomaly strength.
Anomaly detection in EHR data can pinpoint potentially erroneous clinical decisions with surprisingly low false alarm rates, suggesting a practical pathway to improve patient safety.
We develop and evaluate a data-driven approach for detecting unusual (anomalous) patient-management actions using past patient cases stored in an electronic health record (EHR) system. Our hypothesis is that patient-management actions that are unusual with respect to past patients may be due to a potential error and that it is worthwhile to raise an alert if such a condition is encountered. We evaluate this hypothesis using data obtained from the electronic health records of 4,486 post-cardiac surgical patients. We base the evaluation on the opinions of a panel of experts. The results support that anomaly-based alerting can have reasonably low false alert rates and that stronger anomalies are correlated with higher alert rates.
