Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a multi-view learning framework for mental health prediction that integrates semantic information from encoder-only models with reasoning information from decoder-only models. To improve trustworthiness, the framework uses evidential learning based on Subjective Logic to explicitly model uncertainty and fuse the multi-view representations. Experiments on three mental health datasets demonstrate improved accuracy (up to 0.835) and more reliable uncertainty estimates compared to existing methods.
Overconfident predictions plague mental health prediction models, but this new framework leverages evidential learning to provide more trustworthy uncertainty estimates and human-understandable reasoning signals.
Automated mental health prediction using textual data has shown promising results with deep learning and large language models. However, deploying these models in high-stakes real-world settings remains challenging, as existing approaches largely rely on semantic representations and often produce overconfident predictions under ambiguous, noisy, or shifted data. Moreover, most methods lack reliable uncertainty estimation, undermining trust in risk-sensitive mental health applications. To address these limitations, we formulate the task as a multi-view learning problem that integrates semantic information from encoder-only models with higher-level reasoning information from decoder-only models, where reasoning-aware representations and uncertainty modeling are obtained in a trustworthy manner. To ensure reliable fusion, we adopt an evidential learning framework based on Subjective Logic to explicitly model uncertainty and introduce an evidential fusion strategy that balances complementary views while discounting unreliable evidence. Benchmarking on three real-world datasets, Dreaddit, SDCNL, and DepSeverity, reports accuracies of 0.835, 0.731, and 0.751, respectively, demonstrating its potential for reliable mental health prediction. Additional experiments on robustness to noise and case studies for interpretability confirm that our proposed framework not only improves predictive performance but also provides trustworthy uncertainty estimates and human-understandable reasoning signals, making it suitable for risk-sensitive applications in mental health assessment.
