Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper compares Logistic Regression with TF-IDF features against a BiLSTM for tweet sentiment classification on a 10,000-tweet subset of Sentiment140. Surprisingly, Logistic Regression achieved 73.5% accuracy, outperforming the BiLSTM's 69.17%. The authors attribute the BiLSTM's lower performance to overfitting on the medium-scale, informal text data.
Sometimes, simpler is better: Logistic Regression beats BiLSTMs at tweet sentiment classification on medium-sized datasets.
The exponential growth of social media has created an urgent need for automated systems to analyze unstructured public sentiment in real time. This study compares a traditional Logistic Regression model using TF-IDF features with a deep learning Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) architecture on a 10,000-tweet subset of the Sentiment140 dataset. Experimental results show that Logistic Regression outperformed BiLSTM, achieving an accuracy of 73.5% compared with 69.17%, while the deep learning model exhibited mild overfitting. These findings suggest that for medium-scale informal text data, classical machine learning with robust feature extraction can outperform more complex deep learning approaches. Finally, the trained models were integrated into an interactive web application using Streamlit and deployed on Hugging Face Spaces for public access.
