Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the impact of electrolyte wetting within cracked cathode particles on lithium-ion battery performance by comparing a fully coupled electro-chemo-mechanical model with a conventional single-particle chemo-mechanical model. The coupled model reveals significant spatial heterogeneity in interfacial reaction rates, with flux amplification at crack tips, primarily driven by local lithium concentration and stress variations. Neglecting crack-electrolyte coupling in uniform flux models leads to a 25% underprediction of delivered capacity at 1C and an underestimation of tensile stresses, highlighting the importance of considering this coupling for accurate battery degradation modeling.
Ignoring electrolyte wetting in battery models can lead to a 25% underestimation of capacity and inaccurate stress predictions, revealing a critical flaw in current battery degradation simulations.
Cathode particle fracture is widely recognised as a major degradation mechanism in lithium-ion batteries, yet cracking also permits electrolyte wetting of newly exposed internal surfaces, modifying interfacial reaction pathways. The mechanistic role of electrolyte wetting in redistributing reactions within cracked particles remains unclear. Here, we isolate this effect through a controlled comparison between (i) a fully coupled electro-chemo-mechanical model resolving lithium concentration, electrostatic potential, and stress fields in both the active material and the electrolyte inside and outside cracks, and (ii) a single-particle chemo-mechanical model employing the conventional uniform flux assumption. The coupled model predicts strong spatial heterogeneity in interfacial reaction rates, with flux amplification approximately 8x relative to the imposed uniform flux at the crack tip. Reaction redistribution, and thus lithium flux, is governed predominantly by local solid-state lithium concentration and stress variations, while electrolyte potential gradients inside cracks remain secondary under the conditions considered. Uniform flux models can underpredict delivered capacity by 25% at 1C-rate; this discrepancy increases at higher rates. They also underestimate tensile stresses throughout the delithiation process by 10%, directly affecting crack driving conditions. These results demonstrate that neglecting crack-electrolyte coupling leads to systematic underestimation of both utilisation limits and fatigue-relevant stress histories.
