Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the impact of persona prompting on urban sentiment perception using multimodal LLM agents. They evaluate the within-persona consistency and cross-persona variation of agents with different gender, economic status, political orientation, and personality traits when judging urban scene images. The key finding is that while agents within a persona show strong convergence, the differentiation between personas is limited, and a no-persona model can sometimes match or exceed the performance of persona-conditioned agents.
Persona prompting LLMs for urban sentiment analysis yields surprisingly little behavioral diversity, with a no-persona model often performing just as well.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as proxies for human perception in urban analysis, yet it remains unclear whether persona prompting produces meaningful and reproducible behavioral diversity. We investigate whether distinct personas influence urban sentiment judgments generated by multimodal LLMs. Using a factorial set of personas spanning gender, economic status, political orientation, and personality, we instantiate multiple agents per persona to evaluate urban scene images from the PerceptSent dataset and assess both within-persona consistency and cross-persona variation. Results show strong convergence among agents sharing a persona, indicating stable and reproducible behavior. However, cross-persona differentiation is limited: economic status and personality induce statistically detectable but practically modest variation, while gender shows no measurable effect and political orientation only negligible impact. Agents also exhibit an extremity bias, collapsing intermediate sentiment categories common in human annotations. As a result, performance remains strong on coarse-grained polarity tasks but degrades as sentiment resolution increases, suggesting that simple label-based persona prompting does not capture fine-grained perceptual judgments. To isolate the contribution of persona conditioning, we additionally evaluate the same model without personas. Surprisingly, the no-persona model sometimes matches or exceeds persona-conditioned agreement with human labels across all task variants, suggesting that simple label-based persona prompting may add limited annotation value in this setting.
