Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
ChipLingo, a three-stage training pipeline, was developed to adapt LLMs for the knowledge-intensive EDA domain, addressing challenges like limited domain expertise and RAG degradation. The pipeline includes domain corpus construction with QA augmentation, domain-adaptive pretraining comparing parameter training strategies, and instruction alignment with RAG scenario training. Experiments on the curated EDA-Bench benchmark show that ChipLingo-8B and ChipLingo-32B significantly outperform base models and approach the performance of leading closed-source models, demonstrating the effectiveness of systematic domain training.
Domain-adapting LLMs for EDA requires explicit RAG scenario training to prevent performance degradation, and QA augmentation during corpus construction further boosts performance.
With the rapid advancement of semiconductor technology, Electronic Design Automation (EDA) has become an increasingly knowledge-intensive and document-driven engineering domain. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown strong general capabilities, applying them directly to EDA remains challenging due to limited domain expertise, cross-tool knowledge confusion, and degraded retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) performance after domain training. To address these issues, this paper presents ChipLingo, a systematic training pipeline for domain-adapted LLMs tailored to EDA scenarios. ChipLingo consists of three stages: domain corpus construction with multi-source data curation and QA augmentation, domain-adaptive pretraining with comparisons of different parameter training strategies, and instruction alignment with RAG scenario training under diverse retrieval conditions. We also curate an internal benchmark, EDA-Bench, covering representative EDA tool scenarios, with plans for public release. Experiments show that ChipLingo-8B achieves 59.7% accuracy on EDA-Bench, outperforming the same-scale base model and some larger general-purpose models. ChipLingo-32B reaches 70.02%, approaching leading closed-source commercial models. Further analysis shows that QA augmentation improves domain performance, Partial FT offers a better balance between adaptation and general capability retention than LoRA, and explicit RAG scenario training mitigates the decline in retrieval utilization after domain training. These results demonstrate the practical value of systematic domain training for knowledge-intensive EDA tasks and provide a foundation for future EDA agents and external-knowledge-driven systems.
