Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces QCalEval, a new benchmark for evaluating vision-language models (VLMs) on their ability to understand quantum computing calibration plots. The benchmark comprises 243 samples across diverse quantum computing experiments and assesses VLMs on six question types in zero-shot and in-context learning scenarios. Results show that while some closed-source models improve with in-context learning, many open-weight models degrade, and supervised fine-tuning alone is insufficient to bridge the performance gap, highlighting challenges in multimodal reasoning for this domain.
VLMs struggle to interpret quantum computing calibration plots, with many open-weight models *worsening* in performance when given multiple example plots in context.
Quantum computing calibration depends on interpreting experimental data, and calibration plots provide the most universal human-readable representation for this task, yet no systematic evaluation exists of how well vision-language models (VLMs) interpret them. We introduce QCalEval, the first VLM benchmark for quantum calibration plots: 243 samples across 87 scenario types from 22 experiment families, spanning superconducting qubits and neutral atoms, evaluated on six question types in both zero-shot and in-context learning settings. The best general-purpose zero-shot model reaches a mean score of 72.3, and many open-weight models degrade under multi-image in-context learning, whereas frontier closed models improve substantially. A supervised fine-tuning ablation at the 9-billion-parameter scale shows that SFT improves zero-shot performance but cannot close the multimodal in-context learning gap. As a reference case study, we release NVIDIA Ising Calibration 1, an open-weight model based on Qwen3.5-35B-A3B that reaches 74.7 zero-shot average score.
