Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
TrialCalibre automates the BenchExCal framework for calibrating observational studies against RCTs, addressing scalability limitations in real-world evidence studies. It employs a multi-agent system with specialized agents for protocol design, data synthesis, and calibration, coordinated by an orchestrator. The framework incorporates agent learning (e.g., RLHF) and knowledge blackboards to improve the adaptivity, auditability, and transparency of causal effect estimation.
Automating RCT benchmarking and observational trial calibration could unlock more reliable real-world evidence for clinical decision-making.
Real-world evidence (RWE) studies that emulate target trials increasingly inform regulatory and clinical decisions, yet residual, hard-to-quantify biases still limit their credibility. The recently proposed BenchExCal framework addresses this challenge via a two-stage Benchmark, Expand, Calibrate process, which first compares an observational emulation against an existing randomized controlled trial (RCT), then uses observed divergence to calibrate a second emulation for a new indication causal effect estimation. While methodologically powerful, BenchExCal is resource intensive and difficult to scale. We introduce TrialCalibre, a conceptualized multiagent system designed to automate and scale the BenchExCal workflow. Our framework features specialized agents such as the Orchestrator, Protocol Design, Data Synthesis, Clinical Validation, and Quantitative Calibration Agents that coordi-nate the the overall process. TrialCalibre incorpo-rates agent learning (e.g., RLHF) and knowledge blackboards to support adaptive, auditable, and transparent causal effect estimation.
