Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the limitations of using AI tools with existing Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) models, highlighting that current models function as prompts rather than knowledge bases for AI. It proposes a co-design approach for MBSE models and methodologies that treats the model as a machine-queryable knowledge substrate to enable more consistent and reliable AI reasoning. The paper outlines three principles for this co-design and urges the community to address this gap before AI integration solidifies without proper methodological foundations.
Current MBSE models are failing to leverage the full potential of AI, demanding a fundamental shift towards co-designing models and methodologies that prioritize machine-queryability.
AI tools are being deployed over MBSE models today, and those models were not designed for this kind of consumption. The problem is not simply that tools hallucinate: well-prompted frontier models produce competent, useful output over a conformant SysML model, but the reasoning they produce is drawn from training rather than retrieved from the model itself, and different tools over the same model produce different results with nothing in the record to adjudicate between them. The model, in other words, is functioning as a prompt rather than as a knowledge base. Attaching better tools to the same model does not resolve this. The model and the methodology that governs its construction need to be designed together for AI participation, treating the model as a machine-queryable knowledge substrate rather than a structured artefact for human navigation, and that co-design has not yet happened in any systematic way. This paper works through a concrete workflow scenario to show what that gap looks like in practice, proposes three principles that jointly characterise what model and methodology must achieve together, and closes with a call to the community to begin this work before the architectural decisions about AI integration settle without the methodological foundation they require.
