Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a federated learning (FL) framework that combines adaptive quantization and Laplacian differential privacy (DP) to enhance communication efficiency and privacy. They propose a global bit-length scheduler using cosine annealing and a client-based scheduler that adapts to client contribution via dataset entropy. Experiments on CIFAR10, MNIST, and medical imaging datasets demonstrate that their approach reduces communicated data by up to 52.64% while maintaining competitive accuracy and ensuring privacy.
Laplacian DP and adaptive quantization can slash federated learning communication costs by over 50% without sacrificing accuracy or privacy, even with non-IID data.
Federated learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning method where multiple devices collaboratively train a model under the management of a central server without sharing underlying data. One of the key challenges of FL is the communication bottleneck caused by variations in connection speed and bandwidth across devices. Therefore, it is essential to reduce the size of transmitted data during training. Additionally, there is a potential risk of exposing sensitive information through the model or gradient analysis during training. To address both privacy and communication efficiency, we combine differential privacy (DP) and adaptive quantization methods. We use Laplacian-based DP to preserve privacy, which is relatively underexplored in FL and offers tighter privacy guarantees than Gaussian-based DP. We propose a simple and efficient global bit-length scheduler using round-based cosine annealing, along with a client-based scheduler that dynamically adapts based on client contribution estimated through dataset entropy analysis. We evaluate our approach through extensive experiments on CIFAR10, MNIST, and medical imaging datasets, using non-IID data distributions across varying client counts, bit-length schedulers, and privacy budgets. The results show that our adaptive quantization methods reduce total communicated data by up to 52.64% for MNIST, 45.06% for CIFAR10, and 31% to 37% for medical imaging datasets compared to 32-bit float training while maintaining competitive model accuracy and ensuring robust privacy through DP.
