Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces EAR, a novel "editing-as-reasoning" paradigm that reframes visual planning as a single-step image transformation, addressing the computational inefficiency of prior step-by-step generation methods. To evaluate visual planning capabilities, the authors created AMAZE, a procedurally generated dataset of abstract puzzles like mazes and Queen problems, enabling automated assessment of model performance. Experiments with state-of-the-art image editing models reveal poor zero-shot performance but significant generalization after finetuning on basic scales, although still falling short of human efficiency.
Image editing models can learn to solve visual planning puzzles with finetuning, but still lag far behind humans in zero-shot efficiency, revealing a key gap in neural visual reasoning.
Visual planning represents a crucial facet of human intelligence, especially in tasks that require complex spatial reasoning and navigation. Yet, in machine learning, this inherently visual problem is often tackled through a verbal-centric lens. While recent research demonstrates the promise of fully visual approaches, they suffer from significant computational inefficiency due to the step-by-step planning-by-generation paradigm. In this work, we present EAR, an editing-as-reasoning paradigm that reformulates visual planning as a single-step image transformation. To isolate intrinsic reasoning from visual recognition, we employ abstract puzzles as probing tasks and introduce AMAZE, a procedurally generated dataset that features the classical Maze and Queen problems, covering distinct, complementary forms of visual planning. The abstract nature of AMAZE also facilitates automatic evaluation of autoregressive and diffusion-based models in terms of both pixel-wise fidelity and logical validity. We assess leading proprietary and open-source editing models. The results show that they all struggle in the zero-shot setting, finetuning on basic scales enables remarkable generalization to larger in-domain scales and out-of-domain scales and geometries. However, our best model that runs on high-end hardware fails to match the zero-shot efficiency of human solvers, highlighting a persistent gap in neural visual reasoning.
