Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study evaluates the ability of large language models (LLMs) to interpret and generate outputs based on a novel context-free grammar, focusing on syntax, behavior, and semantics through the RoboGrid framework. The experiments reveal that while LLMs can maintain surface-level syntax, they struggle with structural semantics, particularly under conditions of deep recursion and high branching complexity. Notably, the reliance on semantic bootstrapping from keywords rather than true symbolic induction highlights significant limitations in LLMs' hierarchical state-tracking capabilities, which are essential for developing reliable, grammar-agnostic agents.
LLMs maintain surface syntax but collapse on structural semantics, revealing critical gaps in their ability to function as reliable agents in complex environments.
As LLMs are increasingly integrated into agentic systems, they must adhere to dynamically defined, machine-interpretable interfaces. We evaluate LLMs as in-context interpreters: given a novel context-free grammar, can LLMs generate syntactically valid, behaviorally functional, and semantically faithful outputs? We introduce RoboGrid, a framework that disentangles syntax, behavior, and semantics through controlled stress-tests of recursion depth, expression complexity, and surface styles. Our experiments reveal a consistent hierarchical degradation: LLMs often maintain surface syntax but fail to preserve structural semantics. Despite the partial mitigation provided by CoT reasoning, performance collapses under structural density, specifically deep recursion and high branching, with semantic alignment vanishing at extreme depths. Furthermore, "Alien" lexicons reveal that LLMs rely on semantic bootstrapping from keywords rather than pure symbolic induction. These findings pinpoint critical gaps in hierarchical state-tracking required for reliable, grammar-agnostic agents.
