Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the identification and resolution timelines of 245,456 CVEs (12.8% critical) from 2009-2024 using a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative database analysis with qualitative case studies. The study reveals significant delays in both public disclosure and patch deployment for critical vulnerabilities, influenced by industry, resources, and organizational factors. The research concludes that despite improvements in disclosure speed, a persistent remediation gap exists due to organizational inertia and system complexity, highlighting a systemic risk.
Critical vulnerabilities linger unpatched for far too long, exposing organizations to prolonged and significant risk despite faster disclosure times.
Critical vulnerabilities with Common Vulnerability Scoring System scores of 9.0 or higher pose severe risks to organisations' information systems. Timely detection and remediation are essential to minimise economic and reputational damage from cyberattacks. This paper provides a thorough analysis of the identification and resolution timelines of such critical vulnerabilities. A mixed-methods approach is employed, integrating quantitative data from global vulnerability databases analysing 245,456 Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures records spanning from 2009 to 2024, of which 12.8 % were critical, with qualitative case studies of notable incidents. This methodical combination of quantitative and qualitative data sources enables the identification of patterns and delay factors in vulnerability management. The findings indicate significant delays in public disclosure and patch deployment, influenced by industry-specific factors, resource availability and organisational processes. The paper concludes with a series of actionable recommendations to improve the efficiency of vulnerability responses. Despite faster disclosure, the remediation gap for critical vulnerabilities remains a systemic risk, driven by organisational inertia and system complexity.
