Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces GreenFPGA, a tool for estimating the total carbon footprint (CFP) of FPGAs across their lifecycle, accounting for design, manufacturing, operation, and disposal. It compares FPGAs against ASICs, GPUs, and CPUs under iso-performance assumptions to identify deployment regimes where FPGAs are more sustainable. Results show that FPGAs can be more sustainable than other platforms for frequently changing, diverse, and low-volume applications.
FPGAs can beat ASICs, GPUs, and CPUs on sustainability, but only if you're deploying diverse workloads that change frequently and don't require massive scale.
Climate change concerns emphasize the need for sustainable computing. Modeling the carbon footprint (CFP), including operational and embodied CFP from semiconductor use, manufacture and design, is essential. Field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) stand out as promising platforms due to their reconfigurability across various applications, enabling the amortization of embodied CFP across multiple applications. This paper introduces GreenFPGA, a tool estimating the total CFP of FPGAs over their lifespan, considering uncertainties in CFP modeling. It accounts for CFP during design, manufacturing, reconfigurability (reuse), operation, disposal, testing, and recycling. GreenFPGA identifies deployment regimes in which FPGAs can be more sustainable than ASICs, GPUs, and CPUs under the modeled iso-performance assumptions. Experimental results highlight the importance of analyzing applications across different computing platforms to assess their CFP while varying parameters such as application type, lifetime, usage time, and volume impact their total CFP. Across the evaluated pairwise iso-performance case studies with ASICs, GPUs, and CPUs, FPGAs can be more sustainable under specific deployment regimes involving frequently changing, diverse workloads and low-volume applications.
