Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper identifies Actor-Observer Asymmetry (AOA), a cognitive bias where agents attribute failures differently depending on whether they are the actor or observer, as a significant problem in multi-agent LLM systems. They introduce the Ambiguous Failure Benchmark to quantify AOA and find that perspective switching induces AOA in over 20% of cases. To mitigate this bias, they propose ReTAS, a model trained with dialectical chain-of-thought and Group Relative Policy Optimization to enforce perspective-invariant reasoning, which improves fault resolution.
LLM agents suffer from a human-like cognitive bias, Actor-Observer Asymmetry, leading them to make inconsistent judgments about their own and others' failures.
Large Language Model agents have rapidly evolved from static text generators into dynamic systems capable of executing complex autonomous workflows. To enhance reliability, multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing. While such role-playing effectively leverages domain expert knowledge, we find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry (AOA). Specifically, an agent acting as an actor (during self-reflection) tends to attribute failures to external factors, whereas an observer (during mutual auditing) attributes the same errors to internal faults. We quantify this using our new Ambiguous Failure Benchmark, which reveals that simply swapping perspectives triggers the AOA effect in over 20% of cases for most models. To tame this bias, we introduce ReTAS (Reasoning via Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis), a model trained through dialectical alignment to enforce perspective-invariant reasoning. By integrating dialectical chain-of-thought with Group Relative Policy Optimization, ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus. Experiments demonstrate that ReTAS effectively mitigates attribution inconsistency and significantly improves fault resolution rates in ambiguous scenarios.
NUS