Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces AJ-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating Agent-as-a-Judge models across search, data systems, and GUI environments, comprising 155 tasks with annotated trajectories. It evaluates judge agents on information acquisition, state verification, and process verification, revealing that Agent-as-a-Judge outperforms LLM-as-a-Judge baselines. However, the benchmark also highlights significant challenges remaining in agent-based verification.
Agent-as-a-Judge can outperform LLM-as-a-Judge in complex environments, but still struggles to reliably verify agent behavior, revealing a critical gap in current LLM-based agent evaluation.
As reinforcement learning continues to scale the training of large language model-based agents, reliably verifying agent behaviors in complex environments has become increasingly challenging. Existing approaches rely on rule-based verifiers or LLM-as-a-Judge models, which struggle to generalize beyond narrow domains. Agent-as-a-Judge addresses this limitation by actively interacting with environments and tools to acquire verifiable evidence, yet its capabilities remain underexplored. We introduce a benchmark AJ-Bench to systematically evaluate Agent-as-a-Judge across three domains-search, data systems, and graphical user interfaces-comprising 155 tasks and 516 annotated trajectories. The benchmark comprehensively assesses judge agents'abilities in information acquisition, state verification, and process verification. Experiments demonstrate consistent performance gains over LLM-as-a-Judge baselines, while also revealing substantial open challenges in agent-based verification. Our data and code are available at https://aj-bench.github.io/.
