Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses two open questions regarding Drifting Models: the existence of locally repulsive regimes and conditions for learned distribution convergence. The authors derive a contraction threshold using a two-particle surrogate and introduce a linearly-scheduled friction coefficient to bound the error trajectory. They further prove that, with a Gaussian kernel, the drift-field equilibrium is identifiable, ensuring convergence of the learned distribution to the target.
Drifting Models get a friction boost: DMF matches or beats Optimal Flow Matching on FFHQ image translation while slashing training compute by 16x.
Drifting Models [Deng et al., 2026] train a one-step generator by evolving samples under a kernel-based drift field, avoiding ODE integration at inference. The original analysis leaves two questions open. The drift-field iteration admits a locally repulsive regime in a two-particle surrogate, and vanishing of the drift ($V_{p,q}\equiv 0$) is not known to force the learned distribution $q$ to match the target $p$. We derive a contraction threshold for the surrogate and show that a linearly-scheduled friction coefficient gives a finite-horizon bound on the error trajectory. Under a Gaussian kernel we prove that the drift-field equilibrium is identifiable: vanishing of $V_{p,q}$ on any open set forces $q=p$, closing the converse of Proposition 3.1 of Deng et al. Our friction-augmented model, DMF (Drifting Model with Friction), matches or exceeds Optimal Flow Matching on FFHQ adult-to-child domain translation at 16x lower training compute.
