Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This survey reviews multi-agent systems, contrasting classical approaches (CMASs) with those leveraging large foundation models (LMASs). CMASs are analyzed within a closed-loop framework of perception, communication, decision-making, and control, while LMASs are shown to enable semantic-level reasoning and more flexible coordination. The survey highlights the architectural differences, operating mechanisms, adaptability, and applications of both CMASs, and concludes with open challenges and future research directions for MASs.
Foundation models are poised to revolutionize multi-agent systems by enabling semantic-level reasoning and flexible coordination that surpasses the limitations of classical approaches.
With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, multi-agent systems (MASs) are evolving from classical paradigms toward architectures built upon large foundation models (LFMs). This survey provides a systematic review and comparative analysis of classical MASs (CMASs) and LFM-based MASs (LMASs). First, within a closed-loop coordination framework, CMASs are reviewed across four fundamental dimensions: perception, communication, decision-making, and control. Beyond this framework, LMASs integrate LFMs to lift collaboration from low-level state exchanges to semantic-level reasoning, enabling more flexible coordination and improved adaptability across diverse scenarios. Then, a comparative analysis is conducted to contrast CMASs and LMASs across architecture, operating mechanism, adaptability, and application. Finally, future perspectives on MASs are presented, summarizing open challenges and potential research opportunities.
