Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces TwinTrack, a novel framework that enhances the calibration of ensemble segmentation probabilities for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) on contrast-enhanced CT scans by aligning them with the empirical mean human response (MHR). By addressing the inherent ambiguity in expert annotations, TwinTrack provides a more interpretable output that reflects the actual consensus among raters rather than relying on a single ground truth. The method significantly improves calibration metrics compared to standard deep learning approaches when tested on the MICCAI 2025 CURVAS-PDACVI multi-rater benchmark, demonstrating its effectiveness in handling inter-rater disagreement.
TwinTrack transforms ambiguous medical image segmentation by calibrating model outputs to reflect the true consensus of expert annotators.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) segmentation on contrast-enhanced CT is inherently ambiguous: inter-rater disagreement among experts reflects genuine uncertainty rather than annotation noise. Standard deep learning approaches assume a single ground truth, producing probabilistic outputs that can be poorly calibrated and difficult to interpret under such ambiguity. We present TwinTrack, a framework that addresses this gap through post-hoc calibration of ensemble segmentation probabilities to the empirical mean human response (MHR) -the fraction of expert annotators labeling a voxel as tumor. Calibrated probabilities are thus directly interpretable as the expected proportion of annotators assigning the tumor label, explicitly modeling inter-rater disagreement. The proposed post-hoc calibration procedure is simple and requires only a small multi-rater calibration set. It consistently improves calibration metrics over standard approaches when evaluated on the MICCAI 2025 CURVAS-PDACVI multi-rater benchmark.
