Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper benchmarks N optimizers on N tabular datasets for training MLP-based models, challenging the default use of AdamW. The key finding is that the Muon optimizer consistently surpasses AdamW in performance, suggesting it as a superior alternative for tabular deep learning. The study also highlights the effectiveness of exponential moving average of model weights in enhancing AdamW's performance, particularly with vanilla MLPs.
Ditch AdamW? Muon optimizer consistently outperforms it for tabular MLPs, offering a new default for practitioners willing to trade off training efficiency.
MLP is a heavily used backbone in modern deep learning (DL) architectures for supervised learning on tabular data, and AdamW is the go-to optimizer used to train tabular DL models. Unlike architecture design, however, the choice of optimizer for tabular DL has not been examined systematically, despite new optimizers showing promise in other domains. To fill this gap, we benchmark \Noptimizers optimizers on \Ndatasets tabular datasets for training MLP-based models in the standard supervised learning setting under a shared experiment protocol. Our main finding is that the Muon optimizer consistently outperforms AdamW, and thus should be considered a strong and practical choice for practitioners and researchers, if the associated training efficiency overhead is affordable. Additionally, we find exponential moving average of model weights to be a simple yet effective technique that improves AdamW on vanilla MLPs, though its effect is less consistent across model variants.
