Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a hybrid hate speech detection system that combines LLMs with curated vocabularies to provide explanations for flagged content in English, French, and Greek. The system uses one pipeline to detect and disambiguate derogatory terms and another to leverage LLMs for context-aware evaluation of group-targeting content. Human evaluations demonstrate that this hybrid approach outperforms LLM-only baselines in both accuracy and explanation quality.
Explanations for hate speech detection can be significantly improved by combining LLMs with curated vocabularies, offering a path to more transparent and accountable content moderation.
Hate, derogatory, and offensive speech remains a persistent challenge in online platforms and public discourse. While automated detection systems are widely used, most focus on censorship or removal, raising concerns for transparency and freedom of expression, and limiting opportunities to explain why content is harmful. To address these issues, explanatory approaches have emerged as a promising solution, aiming to make hate speech detection more transparent, accountable, and informative. In this paper, we present a hybrid approach that combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with three newly created and curated vocabularies to detect and explain hate speech in English, French, and Greek. Our system captures both inherently derogatory expressions tied to identity characteristics and direct group-targeted content through two complementary pipelines: one that detects and disambiguates problematic terms using the curated vocabularies, and one that leverages LLMs as context-aware evaluators of group-targeting content. The outputs are fused into grounded explanations that clarify why content is flagged. Human evaluation shows that our hybrid approach is accurate, with high-quality explanations, outperforming LLM-only baselines.
