Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates how Transformer LMs process syntactic islands, specifically extraction from coordinated verb phrases, using causal interventions. By isolating functionally relevant subspaces within the model, the authors demonstrate that these extractions engage similar filler-gap mechanisms as standard wh-dependencies, but are selectively blocked. They further hypothesize, based on projections onto these subspaces, that the representation of "and" differs between extractable and non-extractable constructions, reflecting relational vs. conjunctive uses.
Transformer LMs' ability to replicate subtle human judgments on syntactic islands hinges on a "blocking" mechanism that differentially engages filler-gap dependencies based on the relational vs. conjunctive usage of "and".
We show how causal interventions in Transformer models provide insights into English syntax by focusing on a long-standing challenge for syntactic theory: syntactic islands. Extraction from coordinated verb phrases is often degraded, yet acceptability varies gradiently with lexical content (e.g., "I know what he hates art and loves" vs. "I know what he looked down and saw"). We show that modern Transformer language models replicate human judgments across this gradient. Using causal interventions that isolate functionally relevant subspaces in Transformer blocks, attention modules, and MLPs, we demonstrate that extraction from coordination islands engages the same filler-gap mechanisms as canonical wh-dependencies, but that these mechanisms are selectively blocked to varying degrees. By projecting a large corpus of unrelated text onto these causally identified subspaces, we derive a novel linguistic hypothesis: the conjunction "and" is represented differently in extractable versus non-extractable constructions, corresponding to expressions encoding relational dependencies versus purely conjunctive uses. These results illustrate how mechanistic interpretability can inform syntax, generating new hypotheses about linguistic representation and processing.
