Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a probabilistic higher-order separation logic for modular verification of differential privacy (DP) implementations in general-purpose languages. The logic treats privacy budgets as a separation logic resource, enabling reasoning about privacy filters, caching, and higher-order combinators common in modern DP libraries. The authors demonstrate the logic's applicability by verifying a DP mechanism library, including an online Sparse Vector Technique and a privacy filter inspired by OpenDP, all foundationally verified in the Rocq Prover.
Finally, a program logic that handles the complexities of real-world differential privacy libraries, including privacy filters, higher-order functions, and interactive algorithms.
Differential privacy is the standard method for privacy-preserving data analysis. The importance of having strong guarantees on the reliability of implementations of differentially private algorithms is widely recognized and has sparked fruitful research on formal methods. However, the design patterns and language features used in modern DP libraries as well as the classes of guarantees that the library designers wish to establish often fall outside of the scope of previous verification approaches. We introduce a program logic suitable for verifying differentially private implementations written in complex, general-purpose programming languages. Our logic has first-class support for reasoning about privacy budgets as a separation logic resource. The expressiveness of the logic and the target language allow our approach to handle common programming patterns used in the implementation of libraries for differential privacy, such as privacy filters and caching. While previous work has focused on developing guarantees for programs written in domain-specific languages or for privacy mechanisms in isolation, our logic can reason modularly about primitives, higher-order combinators, and interactive algorithms. We demonstrate the applicability of our approach by implementing a verified library of differential privacy mechanisms, including an online version of the Sparse Vector Technique, as well as a privacy filter inspired by the popular Python library OpenDP, which crucially relies on our ability to handle the combination of randomization, local state, and higher-order functions. We demonstrate that our specifications are general and reusable by instantiating them to verify clients of our library. All of our results have been foundationally verified in the Rocq Prover.
