Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
CocoaBench is introduced as a benchmark to evaluate unified digital agents on long-horizon tasks requiring the composition of vision, search, and coding. The benchmark consists of human-designed tasks specified by an instruction and an automatic evaluation function. Experiments using CocoaAgent, a lightweight scaffold, reveal that current agents struggle on CocoaBench, with the best system achieving only a 45.1% success rate, highlighting areas for improvement in reasoning, tool use, and visual grounding.
Today's best AI agents still fail more than half the time on real-world tasks combining vision, search, and coding, revealing critical gaps in reasoning and tool use.
LLM agents now perform strongly in software engineering, deep research, GUI automation, and various other applications, while recent agent scaffolds and models are increasingly integrating these capabilities into unified systems. Yet, most evaluations still test these capabilities in isolation, which leaves a gap for more diverse use cases that require agents to combine different capabilities. We introduce CocoaBench, a benchmark for unified digital agents built from human-designed, long-horizon tasks that require flexible composition of vision, search, and coding. Tasks are specified only by an instruction and an automatic evaluation function over the final output, enabling reliable and scalable evaluation across diverse agent infrastructures. We also present CocoaAgent, a lightweight shared scaffold for controlled comparison across model backbones. Experiments show that current agents remain far from reliable on CocoaBench, with the best evaluated system achieving only 45.1% success rate. Our analysis further points to substantial room for improvement in reasoning and planning, tool use and execution, and visual grounding.
