Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a scientific fact-checking pipeline that decomposes claims into atomic predicate-argument facts, aligns them to local snippets using embeddings, and uses an evidence-grounded checker to verify them. To address hallucination and inconsistency, the system selectively triggers domain-restricted web search for uncertain facts, abstaining when retrieved evidence conflicts with the provided context. Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that this uncertainty-aware, context-conditioned approach outperforms existing methods, especially in high-stakes, single-document settings.
By selectively consulting the web only when uncertain, this fact-checking system achieves state-of-the-art results while maintaining interpretability, predictable cost, and conservative behavior.
Scientific fact-checking is vital for assessing claims in specialized domains such as biomedicine and materials science, yet existing systems often hallucinate or apply inconsistent reasoning, especially when verifying technical, compositional claims against an evidence snippet under source and cost/latency constraints. We present a pipeline centered on atomic predicate-argument decomposition and calibrated, uncertainty-gated corroboration: atomic facts are aligned to local snippets via embeddings, verified by a compact evidence-grounded checker, and only facts with uncertain support trigger domain-restricted web search over authoritative sources. The system supports both binary and tri-valued classification where it predicts labels from Supported, Refuted, NEI for three-way tasks. We evaluate under two regimes, Context-Only (no web) and Context+Web (uncertainty-gated web corroboration); when retrieved evidence conflicts with the provided context, we abstain with NEI rather than overriding the context. On multiple benchmarks, our framework surpasses the strongest benchmarks. In our experiments, web corroboration was invoked for only a minority of atomic facts on average, indicating that external evidence is consulted selectively under calibrated uncertainty rather than routinely. Overall, coupling atomic granularity with calibrated, uncertainty-gated corroboration yields more interpretable and context-conditioned verification, making the approach well-suited to high-stakes, single-document settings that demand traceable rationales, predictable cost/latency, and conservative.
