Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
PokeGym is introduced as a new benchmark for Vision-Language Models (VLMs) in a complex 3D open-world RPG, Pokemon Legends: Z-A, designed to overcome limitations of existing benchmarks by enforcing strict vision-based decision-making and automated evaluation. The benchmark includes 30 tasks of varying complexity and instruction granularity to assess visual grounding, semantic reasoning, and autonomous exploration. Evaluation of VLMs on PokeGym reveals that physical deadlock recovery is a major bottleneck, with weaker models exhibiting unaware deadlocks and stronger models struggling with recovery even when aware of the deadlock.
Current Vision-Language Models get stuck in Pokemon Legends: Z-A not because they can't plan, but because they can't get unstuck.
While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in static visual understanding, their deployment in complex 3D embodied environments remains severely limited. Existing benchmarks suffer from four critical deficiencies: (1) passive perception tasks circumvent interactive dynamics; (2) simplified 2D environments fail to assess depth perception; (3) privileged state leakage bypasses genuine visual processing; and (4) human evaluation is prohibitively expensive and unscalable. We introduce PokeGym, a visually-driven long-horizon benchmark instantiated within Pokemon Legends: Z-A, a visually complex 3D open-world Role-Playing Game. PokeGym enforces strict code-level isolation: agents operate solely on raw RGB observations while an independent evaluator verifies success via memory scanning, ensuring pure vision-based decision-making and automated, scalable assessment. The benchmark comprises 30 tasks (30-220 steps) spanning navigation, interaction, and mixed scenarios, with three instruction granularities (Visual-Guided, Step-Guided, Goal-Only) to systematically deconstruct visual grounding, semantic reasoning, and autonomous exploration capabilities. Our evaluation reveals a key limitation of current VLMs: physical deadlock recovery, rather than high-level planning, constitutes the primary bottleneck, with deadlocks showing a strong negative correlation with task success. Furthermore, we uncover a metacognitive divergence: weaker models predominantly suffer from Unaware Deadlocks (oblivious to entrapment), whereas advanced models exhibit Aware Deadlocks (recognizing entrapment yet failing to recover). These findings highlight the need to integrate explicit spatial intuition into VLM architectures. The code and benchmark will be available on GitHub.
