Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The Yale-DM-Lab system tackles the ArchEHR-QA 2026 task by employing a dual-model pipeline (Claude Sonnet 4 and GPT-4o) for question reformulation and Azure-hosted model ensembles (o3, GPT-5.2, GPT-5.1, and DeepSeek-R1) with few-shot prompting for evidence identification, answer generation, and evidence-answer alignment. Ensemble voting consistently improves performance, and providing the full clinician answer paragraph as context enhances evidence alignment. Experiments on the development set reveal that alignment accuracy is primarily constrained by reasoning capabilities, achieving a best micro F1 score of 88.81 on ST4.
Model diversity and ensemble voting are key to improving performance in EHR question answering, but reasoning remains the bottleneck for evidence alignment.
We describe the Yale-DM-Lab system for the ArchEHR-QA 2026 shared task. The task studies patient-authored questions about hospitalization records and contains four subtasks (ST): clinician-interpreted question reformulation, evidence sentence identification, answer generation, and evidence-answer alignment. ST1 uses a dual-model pipeline with Claude Sonnet 4 and GPT-4o to reformulate patient questions into clinician-interpreted questions. ST2-ST4 rely on Azure-hosted model ensembles (o3, GPT-5.2, GPT-5.1, and DeepSeek-R1) combined with few-shot prompting and voting strategies. Our experiments show three main findings. First, model diversity and ensemble voting consistently improve performance compared to single-model baselines. Second, the full clinician answer paragraph is provided as additional prompt context for evidence alignment. Third, results on the development set show that alignment accuracy is mainly limited by reasoning. The best scores on the development set reach 88.81 micro F1 on ST4, 65.72 macro F1 on ST2, 34.01 on ST3, and 33.05 on ST1.
