Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
FrontierFinance is introduced as a new benchmark comprising 25 complex, long-horizon financial modeling tasks designed with industry professionals to reflect real-world financial workflows. The benchmark includes detailed rubrics for structured evaluation and human baselines for comparison. Results show that current state-of-the-art LLMs underperform human experts in both average scores and the likelihood of producing client-ready outputs, highlighting a gap in AI's ability to handle complex financial tasks.
Despite hype around AI in finance, current LLMs still can't reliably perform complex financial modeling tasks to a client-ready standard, according to a new benchmark designed by financial professionals.
As concerns surrounding AI-driven labor displacement intensify in knowledge-intensive sectors, existing benchmarks fail to measure performance on tasks that define practical professional expertise. Finance, in particular, has been identified as a domain with high AI exposure risk, yet lacks robust benchmarks to track real-world developments. This gap is compounded by the absence of clear accountability mechanisms in current Large Language Model (LLM) deployments. To address this, we introduce FrontierFinance, a long-horizon benchmark of 25 complex financial modeling tasks across five core finance models, requiring an average of over 18 hours of skilled human labor per task to complete. Developed with financial professionals, the benchmark reflects industry-standard financial modeling workflows and is paired with detailed rubrics for structured evaluation. We engage human experts to define the tasks, create rubrics, grade LLMs, and perform the tasks themselves as human baselines. We demonstrate that our human experts both receive higher scores on average, and are more likely to provide client-ready outputs than current state-of-the-art systems.
