Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces "inscriptive jailbreaks," a novel attack vector against text-to-image models where harmful textual payloads are embedded within seemingly benign images. To achieve this, they propose Etch, a black-box attack framework that decomposes the adversarial prompt into semantic camouflage, visual-spatial anchoring, and typographic encoding layers, enabling targeted optimization. Experiments across seven models demonstrate Etch's superior performance, achieving an average attack success rate of 65.57%, highlighting a critical vulnerability in current T2I safety alignments.
Text-to-image models can be tricked into generating images containing malicious text with over 90% success, even when standard jailbreak methods fail.
Modern text-to-image (T2I) models can now render legible, paragraph-length text, enabling a fundamentally new class of misuse. We identify and formalize the inscriptive jailbreak, where an adversary coerces a T2I system into generating images containing harmful textual payloads (e.g., fraudulent documents) embedded within visually benign scenes. Unlike traditional depictive jailbreaks that elicit visually objectionable imagery, inscriptive attacks weaponize the text-rendering capability itself. Because existing jailbreak techniques are designed for coarse visual manipulation, they struggle to bypass multi-stage safety filters while maintaining character-level fidelity. To expose this vulnerability, we propose Etch, a black-box attack framework that decomposes the adversarial prompt into three functionally orthogonal layers: semantic camouflage, visual-spatial anchoring, and typographic encoding. This decomposition reduces joint optimization over the full prompt space to tractable sub-problems, which are iteratively refined through a zero-order loop. In this process, a vision-language model critiques each generated image, localizes failures to specific layers, and prescribes targeted revisions. Extensive evaluations across 7 models on the 2 benchmarks demonstrate that Etch achieves an average attack success rate of 65.57% (peaking at 91.00%), significantly outperforming existing baselines. Our results reveal a critical blind spot in current T2I safety alignments and underscore the urgent need for typography-aware defense multimodal mechanisms.
