Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the influence of perceived community driving-safety concerns (PCSC) on public evaluations of AI driving capabilities using a nationally representative U.S. sample. Employing weighted structural equation modeling, the research reveals that PCSC directly and positively influences AI driving evaluation, while simultaneously suppressing generalized AI orientation, which also positively predicts AI driving evaluation. The findings highlight a risk-spillover mechanism where PCSC promotes domain-specific AI endorsement but suppresses domain-general AI enthusiasm, resulting in a near-zero net total effect.
Fear of bad human drivers makes people want AI to drive, but paradoxically makes them less enthusiastic about AI in general.
Road traffic crashes claim approximately 1.19 million lives annually worldwide, and human error accounts for the vast majority, yet the autonomous vehicle acceptance literature models adoption almost exclusively through technology-centered pull factors such as perceived usefulness and trust. This study examines a moderated mediation model in which perceived community driving-safety concern (PCSC) predicts evaluations of AI versus human driving capability, mediated by Generalized AI Orientation and moderated by personal driving frequency. Weighted structural equation modeling is applied to a nationally representative U.S. probability sample from Pew Research Center's American Trends Panel Wave 152, using Weighted Least Squares Mean and Variance Adjusted (WLSMV)-estimated confirmatory factor analysis on ordinal indicators, bias-corrected bootstrap inference, and seven robustness checks including Imai sensitivity analysis, E-value confounding thresholds, and propensity score matching. Results reveal a dual-pathway mechanism constituting an inconsistent mediation: PCSC exerts a small positive direct effect on AI driving evaluation, consistent with a domain-specific push interpretation, while simultaneously suppressing Generalized AI Orientation, which is itself a strong positive predictor of AI driving evaluation. Conditional indirect effects are negative and statistically significant at low, mean, and high levels of driving frequency. These findings establish a risk-spillover mechanism whereby community driving-safety concern promotes domain-specific AI endorsement yet suppresses domain-general AI enthusiasm, yielding a near-zero net total effect.
