Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces Cog-DRIFT, a reinforcement learning framework that addresses the exploration problem in LLMs by adaptively reformulating hard reasoning problems into simpler, cognitively-aligned variants like multiple-choice or cloze formats. This reformulation provides denser reward signals and reduces the search space, enabling learning from previously unsolvable problems. Experiments on Qwen and Llama models across six reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that Cog-DRIFT consistently outperforms standard GRPO and guided-exploration baselines, achieving average improvements of +4.72% and +3.23%, respectively.
LLMs can learn to solve previously intractable reasoning problems by training on adaptively-reformulated, cognitively simpler versions of the same tasks.
Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) has improved the reasoning abilities of LLMs, yet a fundamental limitation remains: models cannot learn from problems that are too difficult to solve under their current policy, as these yield no meaningful reward signal. We propose a simple yet effective solution based on task reformulation. We transform challenging open-ended problems into cognitively simpler variants -- such as multiple-choice and cloze formats -- that preserve the original answer while reducing the effective search space and providing denser learning signals. These reformulations span a spectrum from discriminative to generative tasks, which we exploit to bootstrap learning: models first learn from structured, easier formats, and this knowledge transfers back to improve performance on the original open-ended problems. Building on this insight, we introduce Cog-DRIFT, a framework that constructs reformulated variants and organizes them into an adaptive curriculum based on difficulty. Training progresses from easier to harder formats, enabling the model to learn from problems that previously yielded zero signal under standard RL post-training. Cog-DRIFT not only improves on the originally unsolvable hard problems (absolute +10.11% for Qwen and +8.64% for Llama) but also generalizes well to other held-out datasets. Across 2 models and 6 reasoning benchmarks, our method consistently outperforms standard GRPO and strong guided-exploration baselines. On average, Cog-DRIFT shows +4.72% (Qwen) and +3.23% (Llama) improvements over the second-best baseline. We further show that Cog-DRIFT improves pass@k at test time, and the curriculum improves sample efficiency. Overall, our results highlight task reformulation and curriculum learning as an effective paradigm for overcoming the exploration barrier in LLM post-training.
