Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the impact of post-hoc unlearning methods on the compositional generation capabilities of text-to-image diffusion models, specifically focusing on nudity removal in Stable Diffusion 1.4. They evaluate several state-of-the-art unlearning techniques using T2I-CompBench++ and GenEval, revealing a trade-off between unlearning effectiveness and compositional integrity. The study demonstrates that strong erasure often leads to significant degradation in attribute binding, spatial reasoning, and counting, highlighting the need for improved unlearning objectives.
Unlearning nudity in Stable Diffusion can severely degrade its ability to compose scenes correctly, showing that current unlearning methods struggle to balance concept removal with broader generative capabilities.
Post-hoc unlearning has emerged as a practical mechanism for removing undesirable concepts from large text-to-image diffusion models. However, prior work primarily evaluates unlearning through erasure success; its impact on broader generative capabilities remains poorly understood. In this work, we conduct a systematic empirical study of concept unlearning through the lens of compositional text-to-image generation. Focusing on nudity removal in Stable Diffusion 1.4, we evaluate a diverse set of state-of-the-art unlearning methods using T2I-CompBench++ and GenEval, alongside established unlearning benchmarks. Our results reveal a consistent trade-off between unlearning effectiveness and compositional integrity: methods that achieve strong erasure frequently incur substantial degradation in attribute binding, spatial reasoning, and counting. Conversely, approaches that preserve compositional structure often fail to provide robust erasure. These findings highlight limitations of current evaluation practices and underscore the need for unlearning objectives that explicitly account for semantic preservation beyond targeted suppression.
