Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the impact of judge language on the performance evaluation of agentic code benchmarks, localizing the Agent-as-a-Judge prompt stack to five languages and evaluating across 55 DevAI tasks. They find that the optimal judge backbone is language-dependent, with GPT-4o leading in English while Gemini excels in Arabic and Hindi, and that full localization of judge-side instructions is crucial. The results highlight the importance of considering language as an explicit variable in agentic benchmark design to avoid biased evaluations.
The best LLM for judging AI agents flips depending on the language you use, revealing a hidden bias in current benchmarks.
Evaluation language is typically treated as a fixed English default in agentic code benchmarks, yet we show that changing the judge's language can invert backbone rankings. We localize the Agent-as-a-Judge prompt stack to five typologically diverse languages (English, Arabic, Turkish, Chinese, Hindi) and evaluate 55 DevAI development tasks across three developer-agent frameworks and six judge backbones, totaling 4950 judge runs. The central finding is that backbone and language interact: GPT-4o achieves the highest satisfaction in English (44.72\%), while Gemini leads in Arabic (51.72\%, $p<0.001$ vs.\ GPT-4o) and Hindi (53.22\%). No single backbone dominates across all languages, and inter-backbone agreement on individual requirement judgments is modest (Fleiss' $魏\leq 0.231$). A controlled ablation further shows that localizing judge-side instructions, not just benchmark content, can be decisive: Hindi satisfaction drops from 42.8\% to 23.2\% under partial localization. These results indicate that language should be treated as an explicit evaluation variable in agentic benchmarks. Full requirement-level judgments and runtime statistics are released for reproducibility.
