Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
DEONTICBENCH is introduced as a new benchmark to evaluate LLMs' deontic reasoning capabilities across complex, real-world rulesets from domains like tax law and immigration policy. The benchmark includes 6,232 tasks and supports both free-form chain-of-thought reasoning and a solver-based workflow using Prolog. Experiments with state-of-the-art LLMs reveal significant challenges in achieving high performance, even with fine-tuning and reinforcement learning for symbolic program generation, highlighting the need for improved reasoning abilities in LLMs.
LLMs struggle to navigate the nuances of real-world rules, achieving only ~45% accuracy on a new benchmark of legal and policy reasoning tasks.
Reasoning with complex, context-specific rules remains challenging for large language models (LLMs). In legal and policy settings, this manifests as deontic reasoning: reasoning about obligations, permissions, and prohibitions under explicit rules. While many recent benchmarks emphasize short-context mathematical reasoning, fewer focus on long-context, high-stakes deontic reasoning. To address this gap, we introduce DEONTICBENCH, a benchmark of 6,232 tasks across U.S. federal taxes, airline baggage policies, U.S. immigration administration, and U.S. state housing law. These tasks can be approached in multiple ways, including direct reasoning in language or with the aid of symbolic computation. Besides free-form chain-of-thought reasoning, DEONTICBENCH enables an optional solver-based workflow in which models translate statutes and case facts into executable Prolog, leading to formal problem interpretations and an explicit program trace. We release reference Prolog programs for all instances. Across frontier LLMs and coding models, best hard-subset performance reaches only 44.4% on SARA Numeric and 46.6 macro-F1 on Housing. We further study training with supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning for symbolic program generation. Although training improves Prolog generation quality, current RL methods still fail to solve these tasks reliably. Overall, DEONTICBENCH provides a benchmark for studying context-grounded rule reasoning in real-world domains under both symbolic and non-symbolic settings.
