Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Hypothesis Graph Refinement (HGR), a novel framework for embodied navigation that leverages vision-language models to predict frontier semantics and guide exploration. HGR represents frontier predictions as revisable hypothesis nodes in a dependency-aware graph, allowing for directed exploration based on goal relevance, travel cost, and uncertainty. The key innovation is a verification-driven cascade correction mechanism that retracts refuted nodes and their dependents, effectively pruning erroneous subgraphs and improving memory reliability.
By actively pruning erroneous predictions from its memory graph, HGR achieves a 4.5x reduction in revisits to incorrect regions, demonstrating that retracting hypotheses is as important as generating them for long-horizon embodied navigation.
Embodied agents must explore partially observed environments while maintaining reliable long-horizon memory. Existing graph-based navigation systems improve scalability, but they often treat unexplored regions as semantically unknown, leading to inefficient frontier search. Although vision-language models (VLMs) can predict frontier semantics, erroneous predictions may be embedded into memory and propagate through downstream inferences, causing structural error accumulation that confidence attenuation alone cannot resolve. These observations call for a framework that can leverage semantic predictions for directed exploration while systematically retracting errors once new evidence contradicts them. We propose Hypothesis Graph Refinement (HGR), a framework that represents frontier predictions as revisable hypothesis nodes in a dependency-aware graph memory. HGR introduces (1) semantic hypothesis module, which estimates context-conditioned semantic distributions over frontiers and ranks exploration targets by goal relevance, travel cost, and uncertainty, and (2) verification-driven cascade correction, which compares on-site observations against predicted semantics and, upon mismatch, retracts the refuted node together with all its downstream dependents. Unlike additive map-building, this allows the graph to contract by pruning erroneous subgraphs, keeping memory reliable throughout long episodes. We evaluate HGR on multimodal lifelong navigation (GOAT-Bench) and embodied question answering (A-EQA, EM-EQA). HGR achieves 72.41% success rate and 56.22% SPL on GOAT-Bench, and shows consistent improvements on both QA benchmarks. Diagnostic analysis reveals that cascade correction eliminates approximately 20% of structurally redundant hypothesis nodes and reduces revisits to erroneous regions by 4.5x, with specular and transparent surfaces accounting for 67% of corrected prediction errors.
