Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
JAMMEval introduces a refined suite of seven Japanese VQA benchmarks, addressing issues like ambiguity and lack of visual grounding found in existing datasets. The benchmarks were improved through two rounds of human annotation to enhance data quality and evaluation reliability. Experiments show that JAMMEval provides more consistent evaluation scores, better reflects model capabilities, and improves discrimination between models compared to the original benchmarks.
Japanese VQA benchmarks are riddled with issues that lead to misleading model comparisons, but JAMMEval fixes this with a rigorous, two-stage refinement process.
Reliable evaluation is essential for the development of vision-language models (VLMs). However, Japanese VQA benchmarks have undergone far less iterative refinement than their English counterparts. As a result, many existing benchmarks contain issues such as ambiguous questions, incorrect answers, and instances that can be solved without visual grounding, undermining evaluation reliability and leading to misleading conclusions in model comparisons. To address these limitations, we introduce JAMMEval, a refined collection of Japanese benchmarks for reliable VLM evaluation. It is constructed by systematically refining seven existing Japanese benchmark datasets through two rounds of human annotation, improving both data quality and evaluation reliability. In our experiments, we evaluate open-weight and proprietary VLMs on JAMMEval and analyze the capabilities of recent models on Japanese VQA. We further demonstrate the effectiveness of our refinement by showing that the resulting benchmarks yield evaluation scores that better reflect model capability, exhibit lower run-to-run variance, and improve the ability to distinguish between models of different capability levels. We release our dataset and code to advance reliable evaluation of VLMs.
