Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the challenge of weak overlap in causal treatment effect estimation, where feature distributions differ significantly across treatment groups, leading to high variance in estimators. They introduce "deconfounding scores," a class of feature representations that preserve identification and the target of estimation while improving overlap. The authors derive closed-form expressions for deconfounding scores under generalized linear models with Gaussian features, demonstrating that prognostic scores are overlap-optimal within this class.
Turns out, focusing on *prognostic* scores might be the key to unlocking more robust causal inference when treatment groups barely overlap.
Overlap, also known as positivity, is a key condition for causal treatment effect estimation. Many popular estimators suffer from high variance and become brittle when features differ strongly across treatment groups. This is especially challenging in high dimensions: the curse of dimensionality can make overlap implausible. To address this, we propose a class of feature representations called deconfounding scores, which preserve both identification and the target of estimation; the classical propensity and prognostic scores are two special cases. We characterize the problem of finding a representation with better overlap as minimizing an overlap divergence under a deconfounding score constraint. We then derive closed-form expressions for a class of deconfounding scores under a broad family of generalized linear models with Gaussian features and show that prognostic scores are overlap-optimal within this class. We conduct extensive experiments to assess this behavior empirically.
