Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
GeoCodeBench, a new PhD-level benchmark, assesses AI models' ability to generate correct code for complex 3D geometric vision tasks extracted from recent research papers. Evaluating eight models, including GPT-5, the benchmark reveals a significant performance gap, with the best model achieving only a 36.6% pass rate. Ablation studies show that providing the full paper as context is not always optimal, suggesting challenges in long-context scientific comprehension.
GPT-5 can only solve 37% of PhD-level 3D geometry coding problems, suggesting AI can't reliably automate complex scientific coding tasks yet.
AI-assisted coding has rapidly reshaped software practice and research workflows, yet today's models still struggle to produce correct code for complex 3D geometric vision. If models could reliably write such code, the research of our community would change substantially. To measure progress toward that goal, we introduce GeoCodeBench, a PhD-level benchmark that evaluates coding for 3D vision. Each problem is a fill-in-the-function implementation task curated from representative papers at recent venues: we first let a tool propose candidate functions from official repositories, then perform careful human screening to select core 3D geometric components. For every target, we generate diverse, edge-case unit tests, enabling fully automatic, reproducible scoring. We evaluate eight representative open- and closed-source models to reflect the current ecosystem. The best model, GPT-5, attains only 36.6% pass rate, revealing a large gap between current capabilities and dependable 3D scientific coding. GeoCodeBench organizes tasks into a two-level hierarchy: General 3D capability (geometric transformations and mechanics/optics formulation) and Research capability (novel algorithm implementation and geometric logic routing). Scores are positively correlated across these axes, but research-oriented tasks are markedly harder. Context ablations further show that "more paper text" is not always better: cutting off at the Method section statistically outperforms full-paper inputs, highlighting unresolved challenges in long-context scientific comprehension. Together, these findings position GeoCodeBench as a rigorous testbed for advancing from generic coding to trustworthy 3D geometric vision coding.
Tsinghua AI