Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the relationship between physiological synchrony, semantic similarity in dialogue, and Socially Shared Regulation of Learning (SSRL) in medical dyads using an intelligent tutoring system. The study found that transient peaks in physiological synchrony correlate with semantic shifts in dialogue and are associated with lower semantic similarity between utterances. Qualitative analysis further revealed that successful teams exhibit synchrony during shared discovery, while unsuccessful teams synchronize during shared uncertainty, highlighting the importance of context in interpreting physiological signals.
Physiological synchrony in medical teams doesn't always signal success; it's the *context* of shared discovery versus shared uncertainty that determines whether it predicts effective collaboration.
Effective collaboration requires teams to manage complex cognitive and emotional states through Socially Shared Regulation of Learning (SSRL). Physiological synchrony (i.e., longitudinal alignment in physiological signals) can indicate these states, but is hard to interpret on its own. We investigate the physiological and conversational dynamics of four medical dyads diagnosing a virtual patient case using an intelligent tutoring system. Semantic shifts in dialogue were correlated with transient physiological synchrony peaks. We also coded utterance segments for SSRL and derived cosine similarity using sentence embeddings. The results showed that activating prior knowledge featured significantly lower semantic similarity than simpler task execution. High physiological synchrony was associated with lower semantic similarity, suggesting that such moments involve exploratory and varied language use. Qualitative analysis triangulated these synchrony peaks as ``pivotal moments'': successful teams synchronized during shared discovery, while unsuccessful teams peaked during shared uncertainty. This research advances human-centered AI by demonstrating how biological signals can be fused with dialogues to understand critical moments in problem solving.
