Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
A large corpus of 19.3 million playable piano chords was generated by enumerating the two-handed search space under biomechanical constraints. Analysis of this corpus reveals that voicing shape has a negligible impact on harmonicity perception but significantly predicts dissonance. Skewness in voicing is shown to be a much stronger predictor of dissonance than spread, challenging conventional pedagogical emphasis.
Forget "spread" voicings: skewness is the key to clarity in piano chords, offering a fresh perspective on psychoacoustic principles.
I present the generation and analysis of the largest known open-source corpus of playable piano chords (approximately 19.3 million entries). This dataset enumerates the two-handed search space subject to biomechanical constraints (two hands, each with 1.5 octave reach) to an unprecedented extent. To demonstrate the corpus's utility, the relationship between voicing shape and psychoacoustic targets was modeled. Harmonicity proved intrinsic to pitch-class identity: voicing statistics added negligible variance ($螖R^2 \approx 0.014\%$, $p \approx 0.13$). Conversely, voicing significantly predicted dissonance ($螖R^2 \approx 6.75\%$, $p \approx 0.0008$). Crucially, skewness ($尾\approx +0.145$) was approximately 5.8$\times$ more effective than spread ($尾\approx -0.025$) at predicting roughness. The analysis challenges the pedagogical emphasis on ``spread'': skewness is a stronger predictor of dissonance than spread. This suggests that clarity in ``open voicings'' is driven less by width than by negative skewness; achieving lower-register clearance by placing wide gaps at the bottom and allowing tighter clustering in the treble. The results demonstrate the corpus's ability to enable future research, especially in areas such as generative modeling, voice-leading topology, and psychoacoustic analysis.
