Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates why sparse autoencoders (SAEs) fail at compositional generalization, despite the theoretical promise of linear representation and sparse coding. Through controlled experiments, the authors demonstrate that the primary bottleneck is not the amortized inference in SAEs, but rather the poor quality of the learned dictionaries. Replacing the SAE encoder with an iterative sparse coding algorithm (FISTA) using the same dictionary does not improve performance, while an oracle dictionary enables successful generalization, highlighting the need for improved dictionary learning methods.
Sparse autoencoders' failure to generalize compositionally isn't due to amortized inference, but because they learn lousy dictionaries in the first place.
The linear representation hypothesis states that neural network activations encode high-level concepts as linear mixtures. However, under superposition, this encoding is a projection from a higher-dimensional concept space into a lower-dimensional activation space, and a linear decision boundary in the concept space need not remain linear after projection. In this setting, classical sparse coding methods with per-sample iterative inference leverage compressed sensing guarantees to recover latent factors. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs), on the other hand, amortise sparse inference into a fixed encoder, introducing a systematic gap. We show this amortisation gap persists across training set sizes, latent dimensions, and sparsity levels, causing SAEs to fail under out-of-distribution (OOD) compositional shifts. Through controlled experiments that decompose the failure, we identify dictionary learning -- not the inference procedure -- as the binding constraint: SAE-learned dictionaries point in substantially wrong directions, and replacing the encoder with per-sample FISTA on the same dictionary does not close the gap. An oracle baseline proves the problem is solvable with a good dictionary at all scales tested. Our results reframe the SAE failure as a dictionary learning challenge, not an amortisation problem, and point to scalable dictionary learning as the key open problem for sparse inference under superposition.
Mila