Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study examines the impact of a public event at Harvard University focused on AI existential risk on attendees' perceptions. Pre- and post-event surveys of 89 matched participants revealed a significant increase in the median estimated probability of AI-caused existential risk (from 50% to 70%) and agreement on the importance of mitigating this risk. The shift in risk perception was most pronounced among those with less prior familiarity with the topic, suggesting that targeted public engagement can effectively shape beliefs about AI risk.
Even among a self-selected group already concerned about AI risk, a public event significantly increased their perceived probability of AI-caused extinction, especially for those new to the topic.
We report the results of identical pre- and post-event surveys given to attendees of a talk, two-sided conversation, and Q&A centered around the book If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies at Harvard University in March 2026, covering perceived probability of AI-caused extinction or severe disempowerment resulting from unimpeded AI development, confidence in those estimates, and global priority. Among the 89 matched participants, the post-event median estimate of the probability of existential risk from advanced AI was 70%, and 96% agreed that mitigating AI existential risk should be a global priority. Although these self-selected respondents' pre-event views were already high (50% and 93%, respectively) relative to results of similar surveys that were previously administered to experts and the general public, the event produced increases on all measures when considering the respondents in aggregate. The magnitudes of increases in risk probability were negatively correlated with prior familiarity with the topic: among attendees with little prior familiarity, 60% shifted upward and none shifted downward, whereas among self-described experts, no respondents shifted upward and 20% shifted downward. Self-reported confidence also increased significantly, and confidence shifts were positively correlated with probability shifts. These findings indicate that a structured public engagement event can meaningfully shift risk perceptions, particularly among newcomers to the topic.
