Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces CALM, a method for improving treatment effect estimation by aligning covariates from RCTs and observational studies (OS) into a common embedding space, bypassing direct imputation. CALM transfers outcome models learned from OS data to the RCT embedding space and calibrates them using trial data to preserve causal identification. The method's finite-sample risk bounds show that embedding alignment can outperform imputation, particularly in nonlinear settings, and simulations confirm its superior performance in nonlinear CATE estimation.
Aligning covariates across RCTs and observational studies via calibrated embeddings dramatically improves treatment effect estimation, especially when dealing with nonlinear relationships where traditional imputation struggles.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects, yet they are often underpowered for detecting effect heterogeneity. Large observational studies (OS) can supplement RCTs for conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation, but a key barrier is covariate mismatch: the two sources measure different, only partially overlapping, covariates. We propose CALM (Calibrated ALignment under covariate Mismatch), which bypasses imputation by learning embeddings that map each source's features into a common representation space. OS outcome models are transferred to the RCT embedding space and calibrated using trial data, preserving causal identification from randomization. Finite-sample risk bounds decompose into alignment error, outcome-model complexity, and calibration complexity terms, identifying when embedding alignment outperforms imputation. Under the calibration-based linear variant, the framework provides protection against negative transfer; the neural variant can be vulnerable under severe distributional shift. Under sparse linear models, the embedding approach strictly generalizes imputation. Simulations across 51 settings confirm that (i) calibration-based methods are equivalent for linear CATEs, and (ii) the neural embedding variant wins all 22 nonlinear-regime settings with large margins.
