Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces Box Maze, a process-control architecture that explicitly decomposes LLM reasoning into memory grounding, structured inference, and boundary enforcement layers to improve reliability. They simulate adversarial boundary erosion scenarios across multiple LLMs, finding that the explicit cognitive control layers significantly reduce boundary failure rates compared to baseline RLHF. Specifically, architectural constraints reduced failure rates from ~40% to below 1% under adversarial conditions.
LLMs can maintain reasoning boundaries with >99% reliability under adversarial attacks when equipped with explicit process-control layers, a massive improvement over standard RLHF.
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong generative capabilities but remain vulnerable to hallucination and unreliable reasoning under adversarial prompting. Existing safety approaches -- such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and output filtering -- primarily operate at the behavioral level and may lack explicit architectural mechanisms for enforcing reasoning process integrity. This paper proposes the Box Maze framework, a conceptual process-control architecture that decomposes LLM reasoning into three explicit layers: memory grounding, structured inference, and boundary enforcement. We introduce preliminary simulation-based evaluation involving progressive boundary erosion scenarios across multiple heterogeneous LLM systems (DeepSeek-V3, Doubao, Qwen). Results from n=50 adversarial scenarios suggest that explicit cognitive control layers may improve consistency in boundary maintenance, with architectural constraints reducing boundary failure rates from approximately 40% (baseline RLHF) to below 1% under adversarial conditions. While current validation is simulation-based, these preliminary results indicate that process-level control may offer a promising direction for improving reliability in large language model reasoning.
