Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper evaluates the difficulty of different Tetris Block Puzzle rule sets using Stochastic Gumbel AlphaZero (SGAZ), a budget-aware planning agent. They measure difficulty based on training reward and convergence speed of SGAZ under varying rules, including holding block variants and additional Tetris block types. Results show that holding blocks reduce difficulty while adding more block variants, particularly the T-pentomino, increases difficulty.
Adding the T-pentomino to Tetris Block Puzzle makes the game significantly harder, quantified by a slowdown in SGAZ agent convergence.
Tetris Block Puzzle is a single player stochastic puzzle in which a player places blocks on an 8 x 8 grid to complete lines; its popular variants have amassed tens of millions of downloads. Despite this reach, there is little principled assessment of which rule sets are more difficult. Inspired by prior work that uses AlphaZero as a strong evaluator for chess variants, we study difficulty in this domain using Stochastic Gumbel AlphaZero (SGAZ), a budget-aware planning agent for stochastic environments. We evaluate rule changes including holding block h, preview holding block p, and additional Tetris block variants using metrics such as training reward and convergence iterations. Empirically, increasing h and p reduces difficulty (higher reward and faster convergence), while adding more Tetris block variants increases difficulty, with the T-pentomino producing the largest slowdown. Through analysis, SGAZ delivers strong play under small simulation budgets, enabling efficient, reproducible comparisons across rule sets and providing a reference for future design in stochastic puzzle games.
