Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper evaluates Prompt Protocol Specification (PPS), a 5W3H-based framework for structured intent representation, across three LLMs, three domains, and three prompt conditions. They introduce a new evaluation metric, goal_alignment, and find that natural-language-rendered PPS outperforms simple prompts and raw JSON, particularly in high-ambiguity business tasks. The study also reveals a measurement asymmetry in LLM evaluation, where unconstrained prompts can inflate constraint adherence scores.
LLMs understand your intent better when you structure your prompts with "who, what, when, where, why, how, how much, and how many," but only if you present it in natural language, not raw JSON.
Natural language prompts often suffer from intent transmission loss: the gap between what users actually need and what they communicate to AI systems. We evaluate PPS (Prompt Protocol Specification), a 5W3H-based framework for structured intent representation in human-AI interaction. In a controlled three-condition study across 60 tasks in three domains (business, technical, and travel), three large language models (DeepSeek-V3, Qwen-Max, and Kimi), and three prompt conditions - (A) simple prompts, (B) raw PPS JSON, and (C) natural-language-rendered PPS - we collect 540 AI-generated outputs evaluated by an LLM judge. We introduce goal_alignment, a user-intent-centered evaluation dimension, and find that rendered PPS outperforms both simple prompts and raw JSON on this metric. PPS gains are task-dependent: gains are large in high-ambiguity business analysis tasks but reverse in low-ambiguity travel planning. We also identify a measurement asymmetry in standard LLM evaluation, where unconstrained prompts can inflate constraint adherence scores and mask the practical value of structured prompting. A preliminary retrospective survey (N = 20) further suggests a 66.1% reduction in follow-up prompts required, from 3.33 to 1.13 rounds. These findings suggest that structured intent representations can improve alignment and usability in human-AI interaction, especially in tasks where user intent is inherently ambiguous.
