Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces IndicSafe, a benchmark to evaluate the safety of multilingual LLMs across 12 Indic languages using 6,000 culturally grounded prompts. The study reveals significant safety drift, with cross-language agreement as low as 12.8% and substantial variance in safe response rates across languages, indicating failures in safety generalization. The authors quantify these failures using prompt-level entropy, category bias scores, and multilingual consistency indices.
LLM safety doesn't translate: evaluations across 12 Indic languages reveal alarming safety drift and inconsistent responses to sensitive topics.
As large language models (LLMs) are deployed in multilingual settings, their safety behavior in culturally diverse, low-resource languages remains poorly understood. We present the first systematic evaluation of LLM safety across 12 Indic languages, spoken by over 1.2 billion people but underrepresented in LLM training data. Using a dataset of 6,000 culturally grounded prompts spanning caste, religion, gender, health, and politics, we assess 10 leading LLMs on translated variants of the prompt. Our analysis reveals significant safety drift: cross-language agreement is just 12.8\%, and \texttt{SAFE} rate variance exceeds 17\% across languages. Some models over-refuse benign prompts in low-resource scripts, overflag politically sensitive topics, while others fail to flag unsafe generations. We quantify these failures using prompt-level entropy, category bias scores, and multilingual consistency indices. Our findings highlight critical safety generalization gaps in multilingual LLMs and show that safety alignment does not transfer evenly across languages. We release \textsc{IndicSafe}, the first benchmark to enable culturally informed safety evaluation for Indic deployments, and advocate for language-aware alignment strategies grounded in regional harms.
