Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the effectiveness of different visually-informed saliency methods for improving open-set iris presentation attack detection (PAD). They compare hand annotations, eye tracking heatmaps, segmentation masks, and DINOv2 embeddings when used to guide deep learning training. The key finding is that denoised eye tracking heatmaps provide the best generalization improvement, as measured by AUROC and APCER, compared to cross-entropy loss in a leave-one-attack-type-out evaluation.
Denoised eye-tracking heatmaps dramatically boost the generalization of iris presentation attack detection, outperforming hand annotations and even self-supervised DINOv2 features.
Human perceptual priors have shown promise in saliency-guided deep learning training, particularly in the domain of iris presentation attack detection (PAD). Common saliency approaches include hand annotations obtained via mouse clicks and eye gaze heatmaps derived from eye tracking data. However, the most effective form of human saliency for open-set iris PAD remains underexplored. In this paper, we conduct a series of experiments comparing hand annotations, eye tracking heatmaps, segmentation masks, and DINOv2 embeddings to a state-of-the-art deep learning-based baseline on the task of open-set iris PAD. Results for open-set PAD in a leave-one-attack-type out paradigm indicate that denoised eye tracking heatmaps show the best generalization improvement over cross entropy in terms of Area Under the ROC curve (AUROC) and Attack Presentation Classification Error Rate (APCER) at Bona Fide Presentation Classification Error Rate (BPCER) of 1%. Along with this paper, we offer trained models, code, and saliency maps for reproducibility and to facilitate follow-up research efforts.
