Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the role of inhibition-mediated normalization in improving learning within artificial neural networks (ANNs) with separate excitatory and inhibitory populations. The study trains these networks on an image recognition task with variable luminosity to mimic complex input distributions. The key finding is that inhibition-mediated normalization improves learning only when applied to back-propagated errors, not just during inference.
Normalizing error signals, not just activations, is the key to unlocking the benefits of inhibition-mediated normalization for learning in neural networks.
Normalization is a critical operation in neural circuits. In the brain, there is evidence that normalization is implemented via inhibitory interneurons and allows neural populations to adjust to changes in the distribution of their inputs. In artificial neural networks (ANNs), normalization is used to improve learning in tasks that involve complex input distributions. However, it is unclear whether inhibition-mediated normalization in biological neural circuits also improves learning. Here, we explore this possibility using ANNs with separate excitatory and inhibitory populations trained on an image recognition task with variable luminosity. We find that inhibition-mediated normalization does not improve learning if normalization is applied only during inference. However, when this normalization is extended to include back-propagated errors, performance improves significantly. These results suggest that if inhibition-mediated normalization improves learning in the brain, it additionally requires the normalization of learning signals.
