Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a framework for proactive knowledge inquiry in doctor-patient dialogues, aiming to model known and missing information to guide question generation and recommendations. The framework integrates stateful extraction, sequential belief updating, gap-aware state modeling, hybrid knowledge retrieval, and a POMDP-lite action planner to simulate an ongoing inquiry loop. Evaluation on a controlled pilot study demonstrates that the framework achieves 83.3% coverage, 80.0% risk recall, and 81.4% structural completeness, suggesting the potential of proactive inquiry for dialogue-based EMR generation.
Instead of passively transcribing doctor-patient dialogues, this system actively models what's known, what's missing, and what questions to ask next, paving the way for more intelligent EMR systems.
Most automated electronic medical record (EMR) pipelines remain output-oriented: they transcribe, extract, and summarize after the consultation, but they do not explicitly model what is already known, what is still missing, which uncertainty matters most, or what question or recommendation should come next. We formulate doctor-patient dialogue as a proactive knowledge-inquiry problem under partial observability. The proposed framework combines stateful extraction, sequential belief updating, gap-aware state modeling, hybrid retrieval over objectified medical knowledge, and a POMDP-lite action planner. Instead of treating the EMR as the only target artifact, the framework treats documentation as the structured projection of an ongoing inquiry loop. To make the formulation concrete, we report a controlled pilot evaluation on ten standardized multi-turn dialogues together with a 300-query retrieval benchmark aggregated across dialogues. On this pilot protocol, the full framework reaches 83.3% coverage, 80.0% risk recall, 81.4% structural completeness, and lower redundancy than the chunk-only and template-heavy interactive baselines. These pilot results do not establish clinical generalization; rather, they suggest that proactive inquiry may be methodologically interesting under tightly controlled conditions and can be viewed as a conceptually appealing formulation worth further investigation for dialogue-based EMR generation. This work should be read as a pilot concept demonstration under a controlled simulated setting rather than as evidence of clinical deployment readiness. No implication of clinical deployment readiness, clinical safety, or real-world clinical utility should be inferred from this pilot protocol.
